The only possible exception will be discussed in the next section. The results remain truly impressive for the price, and show this device is a viable whole-home wireless gaming option for the majority of titles.
#Airbridge router download#
But the NexusLink connection actually fared even better here, beating the Google Nest Wifi node in the majority of the latency tests and average download speeds. Summary: The brick wall did its dirty work, lowering our scores across the board. All formats are identical to the first test. I ran the same tests again with bot devices on the second floor of my home, while I was on the first floor and on the other side of the of the aforementioned Wi-Fi-killing brick wall.
#Airbridge router upgrade#
This is incredibly impressive for a $60 device, and shows that it can be a huge upgrade for slower, older, or less premium routers when used in close proximity. More importantly, the NexusLink device's latency came within a few milliseconds of a mesh network that has an MSRP of $300, even beating it in the average scores. Summary: In terms of speed, it was nearly a tie, with a slight edge in upload rate going to NexusLink. The format here and in the third test below is: minimum latency, maximum latency, and average latency, all in milliseconds (ms). The format is: download speed/upload speed in Mbps (higher is better) | download latency/upload latency in ms (lower is better). This test was performed in the same room with the device, providing best-case signal strength. The tables below outline these tests, followed by a summary of my findings. The broadband connection was a 100Mbps FiOS home Internet plan. All tests were run five times each on the NexusLink device and on my usual home network, a Google Nest Wifi mesh network. To see how NexusLink's Wireless Gaming Bridge affected these factors, I used three different testing sites:, , and the Ping test on. If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping.
0 kommentar(er)
